With the growth of high-potential programs, associations have started asking themselves if they ’re hiring the right candidates. Are they getting high performers? Are they getting effective leaders? Are they getting strong emotional intelligence leaders?
Introduction
Recently, there has been a recent boom in the field of talent management. As this field has expanded, a nine- box grid with nine different dimensions has risen to the top and has been extensively accepted as the best way of assessing an individual’s performance leadership potential.
The 9- Box Grid model for performance potential is an effective tool that has helped associations categorize and visualize talents in an objective and orderly manner allowing talent identification to be done quicker.
It's a well- known tool for talent management, internal mobility, and succession planning.
Plotting employees against the performance potential matrix allows associations to quickly see where their high potentials and high performers employees are to not miss taking action on them.
However, whilst this model has served organizations well for a long, it misses out on an important dimension of employee profile — passion.
The 9- Box Performance Matrix overcomes numerous of the commonly encountered problems during an employee’s evaluation. It includes
Although the HiPos are tricky to find, a scientific study has suggested that developing and investing in them will maximize the company’s return on income. So, finding and retaining HiPos is the first step toward the company’s success.
The next step is to create leadership development plans.
Researchers from Harvard have asserted that companies with proper processes in place will recognize 3 to 5 of their employees as high-potential individuals who perform assigned tasks beyond expectations.
So, how can HiPo’s be distinguished within a company? Using a visually important tool like the Nine- Box Grid is an active matrix in identifying employees who are exemplary workers and have high potential.
What's a 9- Box Grid?
The 9- Box Grid is a particular evaluation method commonly used by associations to assess their pool of talent. The employees ’ assessment is centred around future leaders.
As the 9- Box Grid matrix proposes, thex-axis is the model for ‘ performance, ’ which signifies the employee’s work. The y- axis is the model for ‘ potential ’ and signifies the employee’s skills and behaviour.
Through the above- mentioned assessment criteria, leaders and managers will identify and determine where each employee fits in the Nine- Box Grid boxes.
We ’ve described the differences between high-potential and high- performing employees in another post.
Challenges in Finding Employees' Performance Potential via 9- Box Grid Approach
The use of matrix grid reports has declined in recent years, with the spread of 360- degree feedback and the development of other appraisal methods. Proponents of the model argue that the 9- box grid is simple and intuitive and doesn't require much training, making it suitable for any association.
But, do the matrix grid reports still have an important part to play in finding employees ’ performance potential via organizing and presenting data in a 9- box grid?
1. Not Contextualized
The first challenge with using a 9- box grid is that plotting people on one grid with 2 axes ignores the fact that each role is context-dependent.
An individual’s performance, potential, and competency are completely dependent on their current role, function, department, and circumstances, which completely differ from person to person that you plot, even if they're in the same team.
As a result of the measurements not being contextualized, comparing people on the same grid may yield inaccurate results and wrong talent decisions.
2. No Further Outcome
Oftentimes the process of building a 9- box grid ends with the grid being completed when it should n’t.
A 9- box merely gives leaders a view into where people are in an association and the next steps should be proper talent discussions, decisions, and developments.
Great talent management is all about movement — moving up, around, in, and out, and yet when using the 9 Box Grid, leaders often fail to generate that movement and use it more for allocation.
3. It can’t keep pace
Not only is the process of building a complete 9- box grid time- consuming and taking shortcuts leads to questionable results, it just does n’t mirror the true pace of most associations.
A leadership competency model built manually by HR teams seems to always be out of date by the time it's complete and leaders who want to move quickly to recruit or promote fall back to gut feel.
So when leaders talk about agile business models and agile talent, yet HR doesn't have an agile way to build 9- box models, HR starts losing credibility for not keeping pace.
Including Passion into the Performance and Potential Matrix
One of the biggest critiques of the using 9 Box Grid Matrix as a diagnostic tool is the limitation of being able to only observe employees through 2 lenses, performance, and potential, sometimes causing competency gaps.
While HiPo’s excel in both, they also possess a third trait that allows them to be stretched in their current role, and that is passion.
Passion is the inherent motivation and drive to stay in the game for the long run.
Adding a third lens, or a Z-axis, allows organizations to look at employees in terms of their work performance, the potential for leadership, and the passion to grow in the company.
The framework below shows us how organizations can add passion into the matrix when trying to identify HiPo’s who are in it for the long run.
Read More: 9-box grid performance vs potential
