Universal Entertainment Corporation v. Alexander Eiseman: Legal Dispute

ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that the motion for further sealing is DENIED. Defendants letter and the Declaration of Alexander Eiseman offered in support of further sealing provide only conclusory statements of potential competitive harm. These are insufficient to rebut the strong presumption of public access that applies to the Complaint and its exhibits. The parties shall file all previously-submitted documents in this case on the public docket. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to unseal this action.

https://docs.justia.com/cases/....federal/district-cou

ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that the motion for further sealing is DENIED for Universal Entertainment Corporation et al v. Alexander Eiseman et al :: Justia Dockets & Filings
docs.justia.com

ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that the motion for further sealing is DENIED for Universal Entertainment Corporation et al v. Alexander Eiseman et al :: Justia Dockets & Filings